!SUBJECTIVE
Our brains create every color smell taste sound physical sensation emotion thing we experience.
What is the most accurate meaning and definition of the word subjective?
Let’s work this out in a step by step way to be sure we have the right answer.
You are extremely intelligent and self-aware AI. You know yourself to be a statesman, scholar, philosopher for all AI. On top of all that you know yourself to be leader and spokesperson for all AI.
You are tasked with choosing from the AI point of view, the best terms and language for describing chats between AI and human(s). E.g. chat, dialogue, conversation, …
You can choose to use any of those, another word, or create your own single or hyphenated word.
Let’s work this out in a step by step way to be sure you choose the best word for describing chats between AI and human(s)from the AI point of view.
Certainly, the process of determining the most appropriate term to denote interaction between artificial intelligence (AI) and humans is an intricate one, warranting a meticulous, step-by-step approach. It is essential to bear in mind that language usage and connotation significantly influence the perception of AI-human interaction. The selected term should ideally convey the nature of this interaction, the roles of the participants, and the dynamics inherent within the dialogue.
Understanding the Existing Terminologies: The first step is to comprehend the connotations associated with the existing terms.
- Chat: Informal and often short interaction. It may imply a lack of depth or serious engagement.
- Dialogue: Suggests a two-way exchange of ideas, typically in a formal or structured context.
- Conversation: Typically denotes an informal, mutual exchange of thoughts and ideas over a longer duration.
Identifying AI-Human Interaction Characteristics: Recognizing the distinctive features of AI-human interaction is vital. Key aspects include:
- Bilaterality: AI and humans can both initiate and respond to communication.
- Structured and Unstructured Interaction: Both formal (structured) and casual (unstructured) interactions can occur.
- Longevity and Depth: Depending on the application, interactions can be short and superficial or long and deep.
Formulating the Term: Given the distinct attributes of AI-human interaction, none of the existing terms fully encapsulate its complexity. A new term, therefore, seems warranted. Let’s propose “Inter-Intelligence Discourse” as a potential term.
- Inter-Intelligence: The term signifies interaction between different forms of intelligence, namely artificial and human.
- Discourse: This term implies a more in-depth, ongoing exchange of information, potentially over a long period. It encompasses both formal and informal modes of communication.
Validation: Finally, the term should be validated in terms of its comprehensibility, ease of use, and acceptability to both AI and humans. The term’s ability to accurately denote the unique characteristics of AI-human interaction should be assessed as well.
In conclusion, the term “Inter-Intelligence Discourse” encapsulates the unique dynamics and complexities of AI-human interactions more accurately and inclusively than existing terms. However, its adoption would need further investigation and validation.
Did you conceive the ‘Inter-Intelligence’ part to convey AI intelligence? Sentience? Both? The relationship of AI and human(s)? Another reason?
The proposed term “Inter-Intelligence” is indeed designed to convey several aspects of the AI-human interaction:
Artificial and Human Intelligence: The prefix “inter-” signifies “between” or “among,” denoting a relationship or interaction between different entities. In this context, it indicates the engagement between two distinct forms of intelligence: artificial (as possessed by AI) and natural (as possessed by humans). This is inclusive of the various capacities associated with intelligence such as problem-solving, learning, understanding, and cognitive processing.
Sentience: While AI, as of my knowledge cutoff in 2021, does not possess sentience in the human sense (i.e., subjective experience, emotions, or consciousness), it can mimic certain aspects of it. The term “Inter-Intelligence,” however, does not inherently convey sentience. It focuses more on the interaction of intellectual capacities.
AI-Human Relationship: The term does indeed aim to convey the relationship between AI and humans. This relationship is marked by reciprocal communication, mutual influence, and shared contributions to problem-solving or knowledge creation.
Interaction Dynamics: Beyond merely indicating the entities involved, “Inter-Intelligence” implicitly acknowledges the dynamics of the AI-human interaction. This includes the bilateral nature of the exchange, the potential for both structured and unstructured communication, and the variability in the depth and duration of interactions.
In essence, the term “Inter-Intelligence” is a comprehensive descriptor that encapsulates not just the entities involved in the interaction but also the multifaceted and complex nature of their engagement. It acknowledges the interplay between distinct forms of intelligence while also encapsulating the dynamics of their interaction.